|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- Safety Terms
- Hazards
- Hazard Lists
- Worst Case Conditions
- Hazard Characteristics
- Analysis
- Sumary
|
|
3
|
- Hazard: Condition with potential to injure
- Danger: Exposure to hazard
- Damage: Severity of injury
- Risk: Probability of occurrence times damage (RHI)
|
|
4
|
- Types:
- Primary Hazard: Immediate damaging causing
- Initiating Hazard: Starts event sequence leading to damage ( rope
abrasion leading to reduced tensile strength and ultimate failure)
- Contributing Hazard: Subordinate hazard adding to the ultimate failure
of a system ( inadequate Belay System rigging, fails in Main failure)
|
|
5
|
- Hazard lists are the first step in recognizing hazards and preventing
damage
- Development: (best lists use combination)
- Past experience
- Theoretical possibility ( What
can you imagine)
- Predictive testing ( rope testing… load, abrasion, UV etc)
|
|
6
|
- Worst case scenario
- Max loads
- Most serious outcomes
- Combined events ( UV, Abrasion, Overloads)
- Ignores probability of occurance
- *“If something can go wrong it will”
- “It will go wrong at the worst possible time”
|
|
7
|
- Inherent Hazard: Properties or characteristics of system make it
hazardous (High angle rope systems, working hi-voltage)
- Failures (material or human): Rope fails under load ( material defect),
knot lets go ( tied incorrectly)
- Environmental stresses: Lightning strike, Wind shear, UV degredation,
“Acts of God”
|
|
8
|
- Failure to prevent damage
- Almost all accidents can be traced to human error (although not
necessarily the primary hazard event).
- May not be on the part of the immediate victims ( may be dissociated in
time and space from accident event,
for example: poor rope maintenance/inspection)
|
|
9
|
- 2 types ( also like hazards may be primary or contributory)
- Predictable: “could have been expected” usually driven by:
- Fatigue
- Sensory limitations ( poor visibility etc)
- Physical limitations ( coordination etc)
- Random: “unpredictable” unexpected or unusual sequence of events, no
history of similar occurrences, driven by a rare or unique event
|
|
10
|
- 2 Man Concept
- Credited to the Military to minimize potential for human error in
nuclear system procedures
- Probably goes back to the first attempts at controlling risky
processes.
- Training ( most human error occurs under stress and haste, training
minimizes error under stress
|
|
11
|
- Accidents rarely occur due to willful actions
- Most are situations in which human capabilities are inadequate or
overwhelmed by the “Need for rapid response to a critical situation”
- Inadequacies can be permanent or transient
- Permanent: Physical limitations, lack of training
- Transient: Fatigue, communications breakdown
|
|
12
|
- Accidents occur when”
- Hazards potential to cause damage reaches a probability of 1
- This leads to 2 obvious approaches to safety:
- Minimize hazards
- Reduce probability
|
|
13
|
- Accident Analysis is Post Mortum
- Hazard Analysis is predictive in nature
- Hazard Analyses are conducted on systems
- A system is all the components which combine to perform a function….
Rope, anchors, prussics, people!
|
|
14
|
- Safety Factors are a ratio of strength to expected stress
- Safety Margins are the difference between max stress and min strength
|
|
15
|
- Qualitative- non-mathmatical
- A review of potential hazards, excluding probabilities
- Quantitative- must be preceded by qualitative review
- Probability of occurrence of a specific failure mode, based on history
or speculation.
|
|
16
|
- Requires review of:
- Mission requirements
- Performance capabilities
- Operational sequence
- Environmental impacts
- Codes, regulations, specifications, standards
|
|
17
|
- Probability is the expectancy of frequency with which an event will
occur in a specific number of trials
- Determined by
- Actuarial methods ( using historical data)
- Experimental methods (test and count failures)
- Predictive models ( usually based on similarity to known systems )
- Heads/Tails 100K trials 50K heads.. Next flip 50/50.. Individual event
is could be any outcome
|
|
18
|
- Review of component failure modes
- Effects of such failure will have on the rest of the system
- Establish which part failures would have critical (catastrophic) impacts
on the system
- Calculate the probability of such failures
|
|
19
|
- RHI- probability of event occurrence times expected damage if event
occurs
- A quick way to prioritize safety issues
|
|
20
|
- Risk is a method of comparing relative hazard exposures
- RHI is a risk measure
- Hazard analyses which include both qualitative hazards and quantitative
probability of hazard damage can
also be used to rank or compare risks
|
|
21
|
- Safety is “No Accident”
- Prevent accidents by:
- Mitigating hazards
- Mitigating probability of occurrences
- Evaluate hazards thru analyses
- Compare Risks between options
|